*Check out this video and tell me what you think? Did P.F. Chang's do the Ethical thing? What were the trade-offs for the victims? Why were people so concerned? (5 points)
We have been learning about the human body and how it is organized and how certain structures perform certain functions. For this week's BLOG, I would like for you to investigate one of the topics below and post your well thought out responses back to this week's BLOG by Tuesday, Oct the 19th.
Possible Topics: Pick One
:
Your BLOG response should include all of the following: 15 points total
- Description of the Organ and a picture or diagram of the organ. (2 points)
- Structure of the organ including any tissues that assist its function. (3 points)
- A descriptive paragraph about the function of the organ within the body. (5 points)
- The system the organ belongs to and a description of this system's function.(3 points)
- Any health risks or problems associated with the organ if it becomes damaged. (2 points)
27 comments:
P.F Chang did do the right thing bacause they pain for the medicine. The trade off was the the people get the medicine but had to wait hours. Hepatitis A is very contagious.
Ryan Noell core D
Yes they did the ethical thing by buying everyone a vaccination.
The trade-offs are that the people got good food but got a horrible disease in return.
They were concerned becuase thedisease they got was curable but wasnt a good thing.
P.F. Changs
P.F changs did the right thing by getting vaccinations for everyone. They got the vaccinationn but had to wait for hours. People were so concerned because its hard to get rid of heppitias
I think P.F. changs did the right thing because if they didn't pay for medicane people probably wouldn't go there and they might have a law suit filed against them. The trade off was the vaccination, but you had to wait a couple of hours. People were concerned because hepatitis A is very contagious and could spread among many people.
Yes, I believe that P.F. Changs did the ethical thing by paying for the vacinations. The trade-off for the victims were that they got the vacinations, but they had to wait a long time. The people were so concerned because an employee at P.F. Changs had Hepatitice A and the costomers did not want too get it and wanted to be simptom free.
I think that it was strange taht they didn't know he had Hepatitis A in the first place or during the 11 days other people got it. P.F. Chang's did the ehical thing by paying for all the vaccinations of the people that got Hepatitis A. The trade-offs were instead of paying for their own vaccinations it would take longer to get them. The people were concerned because Hepatitis A is very infectious and lots of people eat at P.F. Chang's.
Core D
P.F. Chang's
Q.1 Yes, P.F. Chang's did make the Ethical thing, by telling everyone to come get a vaccination.
Q.2 The trade-off for the people would be that they get the shot but have to wait.
Q.3 People were concerned because they don't want Hepatitis.
A.) I think they were right to tell people that they were invested with hepititas because they could have gotton lots of lawsuits if people found out and they didnt tell them.
B.) The trade off was good food for a bad diesease and people were concerned that they could get sick or worse if the dont get vaccinated immediaetly.
P.F. Chang's
1. I think that if I got Hepatitis from eating there food, I would never eat there again. I do think they did the ethical thing. The trade-off is that they got the vaccine, but they had to wait a long time. People were so concerened because Hepatitis is a serious disease and can get you really sick.
Yes, P.F. Chang’s did the right thing because it was their fault, the employee had not been tested for hepatitis.The trade-offs would be you get a free vacination but you have to wait a couple hours.People where so concerned because they did not want to get Hepatitus.
i believe that pf changs did do the ethical thing. the trade off for the victims is; they got vaccine faster but had to pay for it. people were so concerned because one of the workers had hepititis so everybody freaked out thinking they might have it
P.F Chang's
core D
Qestion 1. I think it is dumb that they let someone work there with hepatitis and they should get there workers vaxined
Question 2. yes the did the ethical thing because they gave free vaxines so there customers do not sue.
Question 3. The trade off is they people get free vaxine but it takes hours to get it.
Question 4. you do not want to get the hepatitis.
1. Yes because if they kept it to there selfs they would get law suits and a bunch of other people mad at them.
2. A trade off is that they could get the medicen but they would have to wait forever or pay to get it.
3. They were concerned because if you can get hepatitus through eating drinking or anything and they didnt know what the guy that had it, what he was working those days.
I think that P.F changs did the right thing bu paying for all of the expenses. Yes i think P.F changs did the right thing by paying for all the vaccines.
The trade off's for the victims was that they get free vaccines. but the have too wait for hours to actually get them. People were so concerened because its such a contagious virus and no one wants to get it
1. I think that the worker with hepatitis should have gotten the vaccination before going into work.
2. Yes, P.F. Chang's did the ethical thing by closing down the restaraunt and paying for all the vaccinations.
3. The trade-offs for the victims
were that they got a free vaccination from P.F. Chang's but they had to wait a long time to get the it.
4. These peopole were so concerned because they could have gotten hepatitis.
i think p.f. changs did the ethical thing because if the didnt pay to fix the problem must of all the people would have sued them. a trade off was some people waited a long time to get it for free but others called docters and paid and got faster. its very contagiose and many people didnt want to have to be sick
Check out this video and tell me what you think? Did P.F. Chang's do the Ethical thing? What were the trade-offs for the victims? Why were people so concerned?
1)I think that p.f changs did the right thing bye giving them free vacinations.
2)yes theychangs did do the ethical thing bye giving them free vacinations.
3)the trade offs were they got the vacinations but they had to wait.
4)the people were concerned of getting hepititus.
P.F. Chang's-
Yes, because it was their fault for having an employee with hepatitis.The trade-off was the people who had eaten at the restaurant had been given a free shot because it was P.F. Chang’s fault. But, in return for getting the shot the people had to wait in line for maybe hours. People were very concerned because they did not want to get hepatitis.
I think that it was a bad thing because alot of people could have got hepatitas A from the worker that had it but it's good they agreed to pay for the vacinations.Yes they did the ethical thing because since it was there fault they paid to make them better again. The trade off was good food for a bad dieses. People were conserned because they were afraid they were going to get hepatitas A.
The trade-off for the victims was getting good food and not knowing there was an employee with hepititis, so they could get the disease. People were concerned because they didn't want to get the disease, so they got the vaccination.
i think that what P.F CHANG'S did was good.
the trad off is that they got the vacscins but they had to wait for it.
because one of the emplyes had Hpatitus A
Jonathon Deifel Core D
P.F. Changs
I think that P.F. Changs did the right and ethical thing because if they didnt pay for the people to get the vacination then people would file for a law suit against them. If I got Hepatitis I would be very mad and never eat there again. The trade-off was that they got the vacination for free paid for for by P.F. Changs, but had to wait a long time. The people were concered because Hepatitis A is a very contagous disease.
Allison Burst
Core D
I never thought that there would be a hepatitis problem at a restaurant that is semi-close. I would be mad if I had to get a vaccination because I decided to eat a restaurant.
Yes, they did do the ethical thing. Instead of not telling the customers they told them and gave them free vaccinations.
The trade off were they had to wait for 2 or more hours but you get a free vaccination.
They didn’t want to get hepatitis. If they would have gotten hepatitis then they would have weaker livers.
P.F. Changs
Yes, I think P.F. Changs did the right ethical thing because if they didn't then they might go out of buisness or get sued. The trade-off is that you got the vaccine but you had to wait 2 hours to get it. The people were concerned because they did't want the virus.
I think that it is kinda gross that P.F. Chang's had hepititis A. However, P.F Chang's did the ethical thing because they gave everyone free vaccinations and if they didn't do that then people cpould file lawsuits againsy them and they coukd possibly go out of bussiness. The trade-off's for the victems were good food for a bad disease, the lines they had to wait in to get the vaccinations, and if they wanted to get the vaccination sooner then they would have to pay for it themselves. The people were concerned because hepetitis is a very contagious and bad disease and none of the customers wanted the disease the the worker was carrying.
Kelsey Rankin Core D.
I think that P.F. Changs did not mean to have a employie with hepititis A.
I think P.F. Changs did the correct thing because if they did not do the correct thing then they might get sued or other things.
The trade-off is you get a deiseas and you get a free vaccine.
People were so concerned that they were going to get hepitiais A or get ill or sick.
Post a Comment